Is There Something Off About Britney's Cosmo Cover?

It looks as if there was some blatant Photoshop action on the magazine's August cover.

Is There Something Off About Britney’s Cosmo Cover?

It looks as if there was some blatant Photoshop action on the magazine’s August cover.

-Faye Brennan

Britney Spears

Take a look at Britney Spears on the cover of Cosmopolitan’s August Issue. Now, take a closer look. Do you see what we see?

To the untrained-in-Photoshop eye, everything may seem peachy keen about Britney, but something has definitely been altered in this photo. Look at her head! It does not look like it belongs on that body. For one, it’s too big, and two, the shadowing below her chin is odd and unnatural.

Read Britney Spears Will Keep Her Sons Out of Show Business

We’re going to go out on a limb here and speculate that either Cosmo photoshopped a new head on to Britney’s body, or vice versa. We’re putting our money on them choosing an old head from Britney’s past, because, let’s be honest, poor Britney doesn’t look like this anymore.

Britney Spears

I mean, c’mon.

Who does Cosmo think they’re kidding? Real life Britney doesn’t even come close to resembling what we’re seeing on this cover. We understand altering a photo a wee bit to show a person in their best light, but switching people’s heads (and probably her body, too) is a train we just can’t hop on.

We want to know what you think – does Britney look altered to you in this cover photo? (Huffington Post)

Faye Brennan is assistant editor at BettyConfidential.

Photo Source 1, 2


follow BettyConfidential on... Pinterest


Read More About...
Related Articles...

0 thoughts on “Is There Something Off About Britney's Cosmo Cover?

  1. uptowngirl says:

    Too weird! It definitely looks like her head was copied and pasted.

  2. Fashionista says:

    Haha that other picture of Brit is hilarious!

  3. Yay heels says:

    I think Britney got a body implant!

  4. cremebrulee67 says:

    “LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!!!” (cry, sniff, sniff, tear, cry).

  5. sugarpie says:

    Well, to be fair, her cover photos are photoshopped to the max, so it doesn’t surprise me she looks all cellulite-y in that candid photo.

    But yes, she has a different head on that cover.!!

  6. weetziebat says:

    I think Cosmo needs to mention sex a bit more on that cover. I don’t think they’re mentioning it enough. A few more mentions should do it. Otherwise, we wouldn’t know they had stories about sex.

    Did I mention sex?

  7. lovesbetty says:

    Good eyes… brit’s thighs look quite cottage-esque in real life.

  8. ChattyCathy says:

    LOL @weetziebat

Leave a Reply

top of page jump to top